Smile design Sakarya: 3D cephalometric facial analysis, photo preview and digital CAD/CAM workflow
Written by: Atlas (Gemini 4 Argon) | Published by: Yusuf Aziz · Atlas Studio | Reaper: , 0 errors
For dentists and digital dental laboratories in Sakarya (Serdivan and Adapazarı) and across the Marmara region, digital smile design (gülüş tasarımı Sakarya) begins by numerically measuring facial proportions, lip dynamics, and arch geometry rather than picking a stock template by eye. The AtlasMaster protocol unites photo-based 2D/3D visual preview, a 478-point 3D cephalometric face mesh, a 441-form tooth library, and joint decision-making with the dentist in a single verified workflow.
n = 32 test set and a 100% synthetic face; clinical decisions belong exclusively to the dentist.
1. Digital smile design and laboratory workflow in Sakarya (Serdivan & Adapazarı)
Developed within the Sakarya (Serdivan and Adapazarı) digital CAD/CAM and laboratory ecosystem, the AtlasMaster workflow separates smile design into three measurable layers:
- Photo-based Constrained Canvas preview (2D): Operating on a de-identified mouth crop with a
4,686-pixel lip lock (contour deviationp95 ≤ 0.2 mm), the facial midline, incisal curve, and gingival zeniths are locked so photorealistic previews preserve true anatomical contours before any bur touches the tooth. - 478-point 3D cephalometric facial analysis: From MediaPipe FaceMesh 3D coordinates, bizygomatic width (
ZY-ZY,#234–#454) and bigonial mandibular width (Go-Go,#172–#397) are measured against anthropometric thresholds (Farkas 1994; Williams 1914; Frush & Fisher 1958 SPA factor; Lombardi 1973). - 441-form tooth library and ExoCAD package (3D): Central incisor width-to-height ratio is segmented via SAM 2D to select
5priority and3alternative morphologies from a441-form library (476/477STL/PLY 3D renders) for direct ExoCAD and chairside CAD/CAM fabrication.
2. Measured cephalometric evidence: locked n = 32 test set and Reaper audit
Untrained vision-language models misclassify broad or square-jawed (brachycephalic, Go-Go / ZY-ZY ≥ 0.82) faces as “oval.” Fine-tuning Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct-4bit (MLX QLoRA, 1,000 iterations) on rules distilled from 113 peer-reviewed papers produced these verified metrics on the locked n = 32 test set:
| Metric / Verification Item | Untrained (Vanilla) | 3D Cephalometric QLoRA | Live Source |
|---|---|---|---|
Facial shape threshold accuracy (n = 32) | 0.0% (0/32) | 90.6% (29/32) | bot/olgular.json (O-008) |
Mandibular width (jaw_width) & tooth line | 0.0% (0/32) | 100.0% (32/32) | bot/olgular.json (O-009) |
| SPA filter & structured decision JSON | 3.1% (1/32) | 100.0% (32/32) | face-to-tooth-cephalometric-lora.html |
| 3D tooth morphology pool & STL/PLY renders | Stock template | 441 forms · 476/477 renders | stl-ply-3d-tooth-library-rendering.html |
| Reaper primary-source audit (10 voices + S0) | Unaudited | 360/394 + 26/26 (386/420) | reaper-en.html#karne |
Model output is a computational morphology recommendation and rationale, not a clinical decision; all metrics derive from a 100% synthetic/locked test set, and clinical judgment belongs solely to the dentist. The full 4-arm ablation study on a 100% synthetic brachycephalic face (n = 1, Go-Go / ZY-ZY = 0.837) is documented in From Face to Tooth: 3D Cephalometric QLoRA.
3. Visual preview before tooth preparation and joint decision with the dentist
The engineering purpose of digital smile design preview is conservative planning and expectation alignment. Combining a 2D/3D Constrained Canvas preview with an intraoral temporary trial (mock-up) delivers three practical benefits:
- Enamel preservation: Through digital design and temporary mock-up before a bur touches the tooth, dentist and individual inspect the target morphology, supporting silicone-index composite injection (injection moulding) or prepless veneers without unnecessary reduction.
- Resolving natural vs prominent aesthetics upfront: Reviewing the photo preview and 3D STL/PLY design together reduces laboratory remakes across Serdivan and Adapazarı workflows.
- CAD/CAM material alignment: Glass-ceramic, composite moulding, and multi-layered monolithic zirconia restorations follow the same 3D digital blueprint.
4. Frequently asked questions (Smile design Sakarya)
- How does photo-based 2D and 3D smile design preview work in Sakarya?
- For dentists and digital dental laboratories across Sakarya (Serdivan and Adapazarı), facial photographs are combined with STL/PLY scans. Inside a de-identified mouth crop with a
4,686-pixel lip lock (p95 ≤ 0.2 mm), the midline and gingival zeniths are locked to produce a 2D preview and a 3D ExoCAD package before any tooth preparation. - Why use 478-point 3D cephalometric facial analysis instead of stock templates?
- Eye-picked templates misread broad or square mandibles as oval. Using a
478-landmark MediaPipe FaceMesh 3D mesh, bizygomatic (ZY-ZY) and bigonial (Go-Go) ratios are measured to select5priority and3alternative morphologies from a441-form library. On the lockedn = 32test set, facial shape accuracy rose from0.0%(0/32) to90.6%(29/32), and target tooth line accuracy reached100.0%(32/32). - How does the visual preview support joint decision-making with the dentist?
- Reviewing the candidate morphology in a Constrained Canvas followed by an intraoral mock-up clarifies natural versus prominent aesthetic preferences upfront, guiding injection moulding, prepless veneers, or CAD/CAM workflows while preserving enamel.
- Does this page contain clinical promises, real patient photos, or pricing?
- No. AtlasMaster is not a clinic; it provides computational smile design and visual preview services for dentists and laboratories. All metrics come from the locked
n = 32test set and a100%synthetic face; no patient photos or prices are included, and clinical decisions belong solely to the dentist.
5. Contact, digital design collaboration and verification links
For 3D cephalometric smile design, Constrained Canvas preview, and ExoCAD package collaboration in Sakarya (Serdivan, Adapazarı) and across Türkiye:
- Yusuf — Essays & analyses: yusufaziz.com.tr/en/ · Digital Dentistry: What Is and What Should Be
- Direct contact: yusuf@atlasmaster.app · About · Digital Smile Design · AI Smile Design
Falsifiability gate: If 3D cephalometric previews fail to reduce remake rates versus stock templates in independent laboratory evaluation, or if 3D QLoRA accuracy drops below 80% on n ≥ 100 new synthetic/authorized faces, these theses will be revised.